UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoNot that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1561arrow-down127
arrow-up1534arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squaremercano@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down2·1 month agoThat’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 month agoThere’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·edit-21 month agoChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoclaude is gaud
minus-squarePeppycito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoRote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.
That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
claude is gaud
Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.