A friend and I are arguing over ghosts.
I think it’s akin to astrology, homeopathy and palm reading. He says there’s “convincing “ evidence for its existence. He also took up company time to make a meme to illustrate our relative positions. (See image)
(To be fair, I’m also on the clock right now)
What do you think?
People who don’t believe in ghosts just assume that people who believe in them think they are like blankets moving all by themselves like they are in cartoons. That is, of course, not the case. It’s much more complicated than that. Atheists sometimes really fall for the dumbest arguments possible
No, people who don’t believe in ghosts realise that there is ZERO credible, reproducible evidence for the existence of ghosts whatsoever, and therefore no basis to believe in them.