cm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 个月前Supreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down11cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.worldfediverse@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up186arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comcm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 个月前message-square6linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.worldfediverse@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareVenia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·4 个月前wth does “without intent” mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
minus-squarecm0002@europe.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·4 个月前Intent meaning they’re not an ISP that caters to piracy E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad
wth does “without intent” mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
Intent meaning they’re not an ISP that caters to piracy
E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad