• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    “But there’s no profit in that. Why would we do that?”

    • the people with all the power
    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      But there is profit in it. Public transit can be a revenue generator that at least pays for itself as opposed to roads that are nothing but a huge cost over its lifetime.

      And then there are the second-order effects of better economic activity in the areas around metro stations, a healthier populace that is less of a burden on the healthcare system, and overall higher happiness, which makes for better workers. It’s just that it can take a decade or two to see these effects come to fruition.

      But politicians rarely see that far out.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not how the calculations for streets work. National economy is pretty darn complex and streets are paying for itself in a lot of countries.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Source: Trust me bro.

          Public transit literally pays for itself, no “darn complex” calculation required.