It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there’s a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example.
Weird day on Lemmy when animal murder is being celebrated.
Killing animals (without eating them) is serial killer shit.
Eh, factory farming is messed up too even if you eat the bodies.
How do you know he didn’t eat it?
If any animal fucks around, they have to expect to find out. Feels like a golden rule situation.
this community’s mod officially approves of bigotry against people for their gender so I’m removing this comments content
It would depend on the situation I think. We just have a story to go on here and no direct awareness of the events as they unfolded. In your scenarios there’s a different degree and intent in actions and reactions. But if I had to put down some general morality I would probably settle on equal, non excessive, reactions to establish personal boundaries. This entirely depends on the individual subjects though. One could have neurological or intellectual disorders for example.
I always did think hippos had a serial killer quality
You haven’t had to deal with seagulls and it shows.
DEATH TO ANIMALS!