What does that mean, exactly? There are lots of ways to touch grass that don’t involve physical activity any more intense than typing. Playing a board games with your friends is touching grass, for example.
“As someone with a laundry list of physical and mental ailments, my ‘touching grass’ time is extremely limit, and general I reserve the monumental effort there for important issues - like keeping up with the social events of my actual friends, or participating in local politics in my increasingly-fucked-and-fascist country. “Touch grass, it’s more fun than shitposting about history!” doesn’t really apply for me.”
As for the rest of your comment, I’ll be explicit in saying that I won’t engage with it. I have read the linked comments, their context, other comments linked in that context and frankly, I don’t think that will be a fruitful conversation for either of us. I hope you can respect that choice not to have it.
All I’m saying is that, regardless of the reasons, too much internet can create brainworms, bad politics, and toxicity. I’ve yet to hear of any physical or mental ailment that makes it impossible to log off.
As for the rest of your comment, I’ll be explicit in saying that I won’t engage with it. I have read the linked comments, their context, other comments linked in that context and frankly, I don’t think that will be a fruitful conversation for either of us. I hope you can respect that choice not to have it.
Sure. You asked, I answered. I mostly linked them because I don’t believe in saying anything negative about a person without providing evidence.
The Nazis also accused people of being delusional, stop using Nazi talking points!
denying any evidence presented
What evidence presented? None was.
Even then, it’s perfectly legitimate to reject evidence of something if said evidence is not credible. I’m sure flat earthers could present me with countless, rambling sources to back up their claims, but those sources would fail any sort of rational, critical evaluation.
I’m just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
I’ll probably check up intermittently as long as it’s active, and when it’s inactive, I won’t be here. Sorry that you think it’s regulated by some law?
Don’t worry, I’ll block you again soon. I know you can’t resist engaging with me.
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Per https://feddit.uk/comment/26233735
“As someone with a laundry list of physical and mental ailments, my ‘touching grass’ time is extremely limit, and general I reserve the monumental effort there for important issues - like keeping up with the social events of my actual friends, or participating in local politics in my increasingly-fucked-and-fascist country. “Touch grass, it’s more fun than shitposting about history!” doesn’t really apply for me.”
As for the rest of your comment, I’ll be explicit in saying that I won’t engage with it. I have read the linked comments, their context, other comments linked in that context and frankly, I don’t think that will be a fruitful conversation for either of us. I hope you can respect that choice not to have it.
All I’m saying is that, regardless of the reasons, too much internet can create brainworms, bad politics, and toxicity. I’ve yet to hear of any physical or mental ailment that makes it impossible to log off.
Sure. You asked, I answered. I mostly linked them because I don’t believe in saying anything negative about a person without providing evidence.
Imagine saying this as an Uyghur genocide denier and PRC bootlicker.
Aren’t you supposed to be logging off? Now that you’ve noticed I’ve unblocked you, I doubt you’ll be able to stay away for a week.
PJ can’t rest when MLs write delusional shit on the Internet.
Saying that I won’t believe things without evidence is the exact opposite of “delusional shit.”
Using nazi talking points and denying any evidence presented as illegitimate makes you delusional.
The Nazis also accused people of being delusional, stop using Nazi talking points!
What evidence presented? None was.
Even then, it’s perfectly legitimate to reject evidence of something if said evidence is not credible. I’m sure flat earthers could present me with countless, rambling sources to back up their claims, but those sources would fail any sort of rational, critical evaluation.
Thrashing around like an infant are we? Typical of someone backed into a corner and has no decent arguments in their defense.
Someday he’ll log off for real this time, and really mean it! And not just one of his alts, all of them!
Didn’t you claim to have me blocked?
Sorry that I’m active in my fucking farewell thread, I know that’s such a radical idea.
lmao.
I did have you blocked. I unblocked when I heard you left.
Your farewell thread from two days ago? Quite the Southern Goodbye.
What’s the logic there, I’m curious. Other than, of course, the usual logic of repeating blatant misinformation and genocide denial wherever you can?
Sorry that you think a thread is timed like a real-world conversation? lmao.
I prefer to keep a short blocklist.
I’m just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
Don’t worry, I’ll block you again soon. I know you can’t resist engaging with me.
I’ll probably check up intermittently as long as it’s active, and when it’s inactive, I won’t be here. Sorry that you think it’s regulated by some law?
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.