• jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    But we are living longer now. 35 years old is basically dead.

    • parascent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      1 year ago

      The babies died making average age less. Doesn’t mean those who got to adulthood lived to that age only.

      • KredeSeraf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. If you made it past 10 or so you’d probably live to at least 50, with 60-70 not being common but also far from rare. All those dying kids and babies really bring down the average.

        • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Let’s not get too crazy. There’s a 15 year period where young men tend to get injured and young women tend to give birth that acts as a major filter. If you plotted death rates on a graph it would look like a trident – that’s life without antibiotics.

          It’s certainly true that elderly were not a rare sight, but those elderly who could be found were almost universally hardy of constitution or talented at avoiding danger. Quite literally the end of the bell curve.

        • Torvum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Family having like 13 kids, only 5 maybe making it to teen age, daughter dies in childbirth, 4 kids to 50 type beat.

          Population graph after penicillin is very telling