• RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      And with the string mechanics, you’ll actually have a really hard time recreating a playthrough; it’s basically different every time

  • scrion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    IMHO: the randomness and procedural generation kills immersion and makes the game feel inconsequential.

    • wizblizz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think Hades is the exception, incorporating the loop as part of a great story populated with interesting characters.

      • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I never played myself but I’ve watched my sons play and I think another thing it really did well was help them normalize dying and not being good right away, or even necessarily ever. I even noticed an improvement with my older son not throwing his hands up when he didn’t immediately understand something in school. Hades will always hold a special place in my heart which is kind of weird considering I never personally played it, hadn’t thought about that before.

    • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      To me, the randomness actually adds to the immersion, because suddenly no one knows whether an enemy encounter is beatable.

      There’s no game designer that ensures that I don’t get frustrated or whatever. There’s no optimal strategy guide out there. Instead, it’s entirely up to my own judgement, whether the encounter is worth it, or I should leg it.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, I never got the “true end” of the first one because of those things.

        Did in the second one though, because I liked the weapons more, so eh.

    • farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I agree that this is often the case, but I’m not going to Peglin for the story/immersion. That said, I’m mostly playing story-driven RPG-adjacent stuff which would be a bad fit for many such elements.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    If your string/fishing game doesn’t have the random roguelike elements of procedural generation via physics that makes every playthrough unique, you are absolutely doing it wrong.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    For me, the most repalyable games are the ones that either (A) provide a unique experience based on playstyle (original Fallout, Baldur’s Gate 3), just have a great story and are tons of fun to either grind or just reëxperience (Borderlands 2, The Last of Us, Death Stranding), or have simply perfected the addiction loop (almost any Civilization game).

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Add to that, games that are highly moddable and have good mod communities.

      A few decent mods (or even just one really great one) can turn a game into a completely different game that makes it very replayable.

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I usually end up going for the same build archetype so the roguelight feels the same every tine

  • Competitive Online Multiplayer games.

    Like Counter-Strike. The game is always the same, no procedural elements… Still different every time you play because your enemies are actual humans who can think and change things up.