To quote the article’s introduction:

The End of the Privacy of Digital Correspondence

The EU Commission proposes to oblige providers to search all private chats, messages, and emails automatically for suspicious content – generally and indiscriminately. The stated aim: To prosecute child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). The result: Mass surveillance by means of fully automated real-time surveillance of messaging and chats and the end of privacy of digital correspondence.

Other aspects of the proposal include ineffective network blocking, screening of personal cloud storage including private photos, mandatory age verification resulting in the end of anonymous communication, appstore censorship and excluding minors from the digital world.

Post edited 2023-06-14 to insert the quote. I did not notice the auto-generated body before.

  • GenericUsername@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It is still the same proposal. :)

    They already got the judical advice(?) stating this authoritarian bullshit goes against any and every constitution and human rights yet they still try to force this. So, yes, they do ignore that aswell as any common sense.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Who is pushing for this? Is there any real chance that this will get adopted? I see a lot of scare articles, but this can either be some pearl-clutching circlejerk with marginal support and no hope of passing or something truly dangerous.

      • GenericUsername@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I only got a german source at hand atm (I’ll check for another one in english later).

        The map included in this article shows the current stance of each EU member.

        Map legend translated: This is how the EU states stand on chat control: red for, green against, yellow still examines, white still unclear/no position.

    • Kitsune@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh that is terrible. Why is pushing for legislation that violates this in no way punished?

      Ugh, I mean, I know why, but it’s still sad.