I’m assuming this is AI generated misinformation that pulled incorrect information from all the reposts. Please stop doing this. AI doesn’t know anything and only repeats stuff that is said frequently, which is often wrong, like this case.
The outcomes indi-
cate that in small concentrations, sugar serves as a retarder,
but when added in greater concentrations (>5%), it prolongs
commencement of setting (initial) and hardening time
(final) which negatively influence the strength and bonding
properties of the specimens.
I’m assuming this is AI generated misinformation that pulled incorrect information from all the reposts. Please stop doing this. AI doesn’t know anything and only repeats stuff that is said frequently, which is often wrong, like this case.
Actually it was a rephrasing of an actual scientific paper on concrete and sugar and the structural effects.
Source on the paper?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377950104_Arriving_the_optimum_retarder_dosage_level_of_sugar_on_the_setting_time_compressive_strength_and_microstructure_property_of_Portland_pozzolana_cement/fulltext/65be3b791e1ec12eff6f953f/Arriving-the-optimum-retarder-dosage-level-of-sugar-on-the-setting-time-compressive-strength-and-microstructure-property-of-Portland-pozzolana-cement.pdf?origin=publication_detail&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uRG93bmxvYWQiLCJwcmV2aW91c1BhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiJ9fQ
So 100% bullshit