• Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 天前

    Incoming: US cries about how unsafe open models are and that they should be banned. That the only “Safe™®©” model is one you buy from Altman or whatever anthropics chief scumbag officers name is. AI bubble pops and “we” (read: you and me, Johnny and Jane public) have to bail them out to Save US Innovation™©® from China…

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 天前

      I read the article expecting the same thing, but it said that Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir recently released a big statement warning the US not to restrict open models.

      Which is weird. I don’t believe for a minute that you and I are on the same side as those jackals, but I guess they are not as dumb as I expected on this particular day (be sure to check again tomorrow, though).

      This whole thing is stupid and I want this bubble to burst. I don’t look forward to the economic consequences for people like my parents who live on retirement savings, but lord, this whole economic system is just totally cooked and it can’t go on like this.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 天前

        If they understand that there’s no moat for their AI R&D business, perhaps they’re looking to a possible future where they could lower their cost of R&D by picking up open models and running them for inference. Especially if the current spending collapses.

    • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 天前

      It’s a shame there’s still no 3.8 MoE model that can run on consumer hardware. Still stuck at 3.6 if you need to leverage offloading experts to CPU