• StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’d probably be willing to view ads if the experience wasn’t literally jarring.

    Not me, sorry. Fuck ads. I’ve been ad-free for like a decade, and I’m not interested in regressing.

    • confusedwiseman@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if there was a balance and the ads were non-intrusive? I mean, servers and bandwidth cost money. I’m in the same boat as you where I have run ad blockers, adblocker blockers, no script, privacy enhancers, and anti-fingerprinting since forever ago.

      I’d rather view a few reasonable ads than have a site try to mine and sell my data. If there was a balance, this is where I’d say it was reasonable. Since not reality, I’m with you, nuke them all, and just take the content.

      • longshaden@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The definition of “reasonable ads” and “just a few ads” keeps sliding. I’m old enough to remember the early internet, and that this lie has been told many times.

        Just a few acceptable ads always becomes many unacceptable ads, because money.

      • Kir
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m willing to pay for site and services I consider valuable. Not with my data, not with my attention.

      • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even if there was a balance and the ads were non-intrusive?

        I don’t need propaganda telling me to want to buy shit that I otherwise wouldn’t want to buy, no. I’ll go to other consumers (and, more specifically, people I trust) to determine what things are worth, not entities with a conflict of interest in the matter.

        The whole marketing/advertising industry is illegitimate and harmful, and I’m “boycotting” the whole thing until we finish the job of destroying capitalism and it’s no longer needed anyway.

        I’d rather view a few reasonable ads than have a site try to mine and sell my data.

        The corporations are going to try to mine and sell your data anyway. Why wouldn’t they? You think just because they have a revenue stream through ads that they’ll give up another revenue stream from fucking over your privacy? Then I’ve got this nice bridge to sell you, too…

        • confusedwiseman@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you’re right, I feel like I’m looking for a little good-will among our kind (bleak and probably misguided at best). Sellers and consumers need to coexist in some manner, but what that relationship should be is yet to be defined. For now, we’re in a place that needs change for sure.