db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 10 months agoOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comexternal-linkmessage-square203fedilinkarrow-up1778arrow-down133cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1745arrow-down1external-linkOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square203fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down11·edit-210 months agoLots of ads Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·10 months agoRight, so ads aren’t a recent development.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoAds have existed for an extremely long time. And most news has cost money since forever. Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·10 months agoTV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·10 months agoAgain, that was not my point.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·10 months agoNot sure why you keep stating it.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoWhy are you so stuck on the tv thing?
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·10 months agoBecause you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoI mentioned it as a sidenote. It’s not important, forget about it. Either way it’s subjective and honestly 80 years is not that long, but who cares 🤷
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·10 months agoHow is something 80 years old “new?”
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·10 months agoRelatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads. Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.
Lots of ads
Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.
Right, so ads aren’t a recent development.
Ads have existed for an extremely long time.
And most news has cost money since forever.
Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
TV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
Again, that was not my point.
Not sure why you keep stating it.
Why are you so stuck on the tv thing?
Because you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
I mentioned it as a sidenote. It’s not important, forget about it.
Either way it’s subjective and honestly 80 years is not that long, but who cares 🤷
How is something 80 years old “new?”
Relatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads.
Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.