• thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What about infrastructure costs? Are you comfortable making someone else pay for your access? What about the design and implementation of the API? Should all software be free?

    Please note that I’m not trying to support this decision at all. I personally feel like API access is similar to SSO for enterprise stuff (check out sso.tax). I also feel like there should be some level of compensation and even profit so people can focus on building stuff like this. It’s really hard to define what that is, especially without transparent costs, which I don’t believe OpenSubtitles shares? Also they use super predatory ads so I don’t think they have any high ground to even suggest what I’m talking about.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They host incredibly tiny text files. We are talking in the single KB range. Even serving millions of these a day is minor load to current hosting environments.

      Most modern webpages load the equivalent of 1000s of subtitles to every user on every page load, including small sites like personal blogs.

      I would be surprised if their hosting costs were even in the $1000s/month instead of $100s.

      Thats the likely reason they don’t share the costs. It’s that cheap to run. Even asking for donations might be pushing it. Demanding payment? Bullshit.