The late Ariel Sharon, a longtime Israeli soldier and political leader, confided his thoughts to his close friend Uri Dan, an Israeli journalist. Their beliefs can be found in This Burning Land, by Greg Myre and Jennifer Griffin.

“The bond between the two men was built on an unshakable belief. The Jews and the Arabs had been fighting for generations, and… no resolution was on the horizon,” reads This Burning Land.

As Sharon and Dan saw it, “the Arabs had never genuinely accepted the presence of Israel,” and so a two-state solution was not possible nor even desirable. They “accepted the conflict as a permanent feature of life in the Middle East, part of the world they were born into, and part of the world they would leave behind… In their minds—and in the minds of a fair number of Israelis and Palestinians—if you did not accept the enduring nature of the conflict, then you did not understand the conflict at all.”

The 2010 book did not state the views of Benjamin Netanyahu, who at that time was beginning a long run as prime minister. But the idea of a long-lasting conflict helps to make sense of Netanyahu’s interview Friday on NPR’s Morning Edition, as well as several past conversations.

  • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/npr/

    Detailed Report

    Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER

    Factual Reporting: HIGH

    Country: USA

    MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE

    Media Type: Radio Station

    Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

    MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s National Public Radio, I think everyone understands it’s on point. You don’t have to prove it.

      • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just so it’s not misunderstood, the reason I am posting Media Bias/Fact Check summaries is to add context. It is not to say that one particular news source is biased or shouldn’t be trusted. Perspectives and life experiences vary, and I don’t think we can assume everyone here is on the same page or that everyone is familiar with any particular American news outlet.

          • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I appreciate your service moderating this place. I think I’ll keep including it in my posts because I find it helpful, but I’m sorry you have to deal with additional spam reports about it.