I wouldn’t say proglangs are rules. Rather, they are a language of instructions to the machine; the language can often be converted to machine instructions through a tool (often a compiler).
Class contradictions of course have an impact.
I think the UNIX philosophy hold some communist values:
A communal interface for programs and scripts should exist to reduce redundant code.
Programs should not have private property (or internal code) when unneccessary.
I think that the “Test prototypes often” is a result idea from the cold war era. Heavy testing was neccessary to ensure that programs functioned properly.
The UNIX philosophy was born in an environment with a lack of surplus; likewise, the primal environment neccessitated communism in humans due to the lack of surplus.
Also, it’s interesting that computers could technically be described in DiaMat.
Voltage changes form a principal contradiction between states. (Typically a binary state.)
Electrical circuits form base contradictions in some way.
These two ‘principal’ contradiction form the base for a higher-level contradiction:
A contradiction between the setter/retriever (CPU) and Memory.
I wouldn’t say proglangs are rules. Rather, they are a language of instructions to the machine; the language can often be converted to machine instructions through a tool (often a compiler).
Class contradictions of course have an impact.
I think the UNIX philosophy hold some communist values:
The UNIX philosophy was born in an environment with a lack of surplus; likewise, the primal environment neccessitated communism in humans due to the lack of surplus.
Also, it’s interesting that computers could technically be described in DiaMat.
These two ‘principal’ contradiction form the base for a higher-level contradiction: