Brands fed up with the instability at Twitter may flock to Meta’s new offering

Archive link

    • Clairvoidance@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well I think it’s kinda hard to imagine a free service that doesn’t do either data collection or advertising or both (read: you are the product), it makes sense through openly being a field that has a lot of money circulating around it

      The only other viable model I can personally think of is subscriptions, I find it hard to imagine that only forcing big corporations to pay to use your service, or that having it be donationbased would work with the amount of manpower and serverspace these products from within Silicon Valley typically host where they need millions maybe billions every month until they stop existing

      • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All of the automotive forums I ever used did make their money from advertising, BUT it was relevant advertising. Either it was sponsored by a vendor that specialized in that platform (ipdusa.com) or outright owned by a vendor (modernperformance.com)

        These vendors also sold products that the users inherently wanted to buy and discuss. It was a symbiotic relationship. The discussion forum facilitated the business by allowing users to discuss their interest in an automotive platform.

        I believe this is why the LTT platform still exists as well.

        • beefcat@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is easier to do when your community covers some particular niche. That effectively does the ad targeting for you. An auto parts store knows that most people in a forum about car repair might actually be interested in their product.

          It’s harder with a more general purpose community like Facebook or Twitter. Most people on these platforms probably have no interest in auto parts. A good chunk of them might not even own cars at all. Initially, this meant that impressions sold in these spaces were dirt cheap, because they so rarely converted into clicks. This is where data collection comes in, because it allows your advertisers to actually narrow the focus of their ad campaigns to users that might actually be relevant. And the more data Facebook has on you, the more detailed and effective these campaigns can become.

      • beefcat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Data collection and advertising go hand in hand. The data on it’s own isn’t very valuable. Where companies like Facebook and Google make the real money is in how their advertising platforms let customers use this data to target ads far more effectively than just showing them at random.