- cross-posted to:
- energy@slrpnk.net
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- energy@slrpnk.net
- technology@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Huh. So I guess fusion is only 20 years away.
Give it another 20 years, maybe it’ll only be 15 years away then!
Always.
Article is misleading and basically bullshit.
How?
Maybe they’re upset that this isn’t an independent replication by a different group? It’s the same facility and group reporting these results because this machine is truly one of a kind.
Watch this. https://youtu.be/czjisEGe5Cw?si=O1G6nQdzMQI_Gxac
Hmm, so it basically quotes https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/dec/14/first-edition-nuclear-fusion , which among other things says that the energy produced by the thing is currently unusable (which is what the video quotes at 9:00)
Still feels like a breakthrough
They’ve sort of” – you can hear the pain of this simplification in Bluck’s voice as he speaks – “solved the physics issues, and now they’re looking squarely at the engineering issues.”
Well you take a few of the letters out of the title and you can spell bullshit. I guess?
Sounds like every article about fusion ngl
