Pascal called for opening roles so that they can be cast by actors of different racial or gender identities than how the character was originally portrayed.

  • CaptFrey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems to be just another defence from the void of creativity that is today’s Hollywood. Why not just tell good NEW stories from all cultures on earth? That is interesting. Not converting old and beloved stories to fit their false pandering - this is just another weird guilt trip to sell their lack of creative ideas.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it Hollywood’s lack of creativity or is the audience’s? There’s a reason all but 2 of the top 10 grossing films last year were remakes/sequels/reboots. Hollywood isn’t forcing anyone to see those movies, but those are the movies audiences consistently seem to choose.

      While I love new stories and take time off work to see them every year at ViFF, in a culture where reboots reign supreme, we either change the moviegoing audience’s demands/tastes dramatically OR just as we allow new actors to take on some of those iconic roles to which we flock (like say, Batman, Captain Picard etc) we don’t restrict those actors to being the same ethnicity as the first actor was. One seems much more practical than the other.

      Demanding that diversity only comes in new stories relegates diversity to the cultural scrap heap. While I wish we sought out new stories, for whatever reason, we want Marvel movie 732432 instead.

      • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a counterpoint, Hollywood and establishment media is losing relevance hourly. People are spending less time watching yet another remake/sequel/reboot, and they’re spending a lot more time watching completely original content on youtube, or having discussions on reddit (or lemmy), or playing video games.

        The argument you’re making would have been more persuasive back when Hollywood had a virtual monopoly on creativity, but they’ve been eating their seed corn for so long it’s having major long-term effects on the creative industry in America.

        Japan is an interesting example of another way media could be done. There’s a content pipeline in a lot of cases of webnovel to light novel to manga to anime to movie (and of course that’s not the only thing that exists in the country but I’m a weeb so shut up), and it’s having an outsized influence globally. The manga industry dwarfs the American comic book industry, and while there are remakes and sequels, it isn’t the majority of the media coming out.

        In the west, we’ve also seen some examples of hits from other countries that weren’t based on anything else, such as squid game and parasyte out of Korea. There’s also been some successes such as M3gan which made over 10 times its production budget.

        Then there’s stuff like indiegogo and patreon, where people are going out to directly fund indies because they’re so hungry for something different.

      • CaptFrey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes this is also probably very true. the reboot of lion king made a billion and that says more about the audience than the filmmakers.