YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldM to NFL@lemmy.world · 1 year agoFans weren't pleased with Peacock's exclusive broadcast of Bills-Chargers matchupawfulannouncing.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down14
arrow-up165arrow-down1external-linkFans weren't pleased with Peacock's exclusive broadcast of Bills-Chargers matchupawfulannouncing.comYoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldM to NFL@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarebeckerist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoI sure as s— wasn’t going to pay for a month of peacock for one game. I wonder if they made any money off it, I imagine securing the streaming rights wasn’t cheap
minus-squareNusm@yall.theatl.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoPeacock is owned by NBC, so I wonder if it’s part of the NBC/NFL contract. If so, it didn’t cost any more to put it on Peacock.
I sure as s— wasn’t going to pay for a month of peacock for one game. I wonder if they made any money off it, I imagine securing the streaming rights wasn’t cheap
Peacock is owned by NBC, so I wonder if it’s part of the NBC/NFL contract. If so, it didn’t cost any more to put it on Peacock.