nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.comexternal-linkmessage-square268fedilinkarrow-up1599arrow-down134cross-posted to: starfield@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1565arrow-down1external-linkStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square268fedilinkcross-posted to: starfield@lemmy.zip
minus-squareAlexWIWA@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up109arrow-down3·1 year agoSomehow it got nominated for the “most innovative gameplay” in the Steam awards. Absolute joke
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up69arrow-down4·1 year agoIDK, it’s been awhile since someone had the audacity to make something so repetitive and pass it off as AAA gameplay.
minus-squareAlexWIWA@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·1 year agoIt required true innovation to make a game this aggressively mediocre and bland. True
minus-squareGentlemanLoser@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·1 year agoYeah, the last time was FO4
minus-squareBoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoWE DON’T TALK ABOUT FO76.
minus-squareVilian@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoyou need to be able to open the game to see the bland gameplay
minus-squarePanPuszek@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·1 year agoIt’s completely beyond me. Bethesda fanboys had to be on some hard as shit copium to nominate it.
minus-squarePraiseTheSoup@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI can’t really think of any part of it that is innovative. Just basic game systems that have all been done before slapped together.
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down9·1 year agoYou can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland. But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
minus-squaremerthyr1831@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoYou have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
minus-squareGentlemanLoser@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
minus-squaremerthyr1831@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoA directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
minus-squareWilliam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
minus-squareAlexWIWA@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoTrue that idea was definitely cool
Somehow it got nominated for the “most innovative gameplay” in the Steam awards. Absolute joke
IDK, it’s been awhile since someone had the audacity to make something so repetitive and pass it off as AAA gameplay.
It required true innovation to make a game this aggressively mediocre and bland. True
Yeah, the last time was FO4
FO76 is calling…
WE DON’T TALK ABOUT FO76.
you need to be able to open the game to see the bland gameplay
It’s completely beyond me. Bethesda fanboys had to be on some hard as shit copium to nominate it.
I can’t really think of any part of it that is innovative. Just basic game systems that have all been done before slapped together.
You can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland.
But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
You have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
That’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
A directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
I thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
True that idea was definitely cool