We asked professionals if they wanted Apple’s desktop, and they all said no.

  • beefcat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    MacBooks are super popular in a variety of professional fields. They are still the go-to machines for photography and video editing. They are popular in software development for providing a good UNIX environment out of the box while also being very solidly built machines.

    The more my software engineering career matures, the more I see my peers using MacBooks.

    Windows still absolutely dominates government and enterprise, but the idea that professionals don’t use Macs is pretty nonsensical. It’s the kind of thing I believed when I was 20 and working in tech support, back when I still thought it was cool to call Apple users “sheep”.

    • radiojosh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Apple is going to lose that edge with developers as WSL and its ecosystem keep improving. There’s no Apple servers, so a lot of that code they’re writing runs on Linux, but Macs only look like Linux. They actually work differently, and you have to use homebrew and a lot of tools are different. But I can load up just about any distro with WSL, so all the packages install the same. Add on top of that the difficulty of making Mac work with AD and having a different version of Microsoft Office. Plus their licensing terms for virtualization are terrible, and they don’t make multi-session servers anymore, so developing IOS apps usually means you have a small fleet of Mac Minis instead of some nice enterprise hardware.

      • im_nullable@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought this too until every Windows patch started turning my computer into an ad machine.

        WSLn is nice but using a Windows 11 machine is starting to suck big time.

    • radiojosh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Apple is going to lose that edge with developers as WSL and its ecosystem keep improving. There’s no Apple servers, so a lot of that code they’re writing runs on Linux, but Macs only look like Linux. They actually work differently, and you have to use homebrew and a lot of tools are different. But I can load up just about any distro with WSL, so all the packages install the same. Add on top of that the difficulty of making Mac work with AD and having a different version of Microsoft Office. Plus their licensing terms for virtualization are terrible, and they don’t make multi-session servers anymore, so developing IOS apps usually means you have a small fleet of Mac Minis instead of some nice enterprise hardware.

    • batcheck@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. Good enterprises offer both options. I think people are starting to realize that its best to let people pick the tool that works best for them in this circumstance. Also, equivalent Dells (I have mainly worked at Dell shops lately) are actually more expensive than a MacBook Pro.

      Another thing is that enterprise tools lock down Macs a lot less in my experience. This usually pushes people in the direction of Mac when you don’t have to go through an approval process to install an app or package you want to test.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unix doesn’t matter if you still have to run a VM to run docker. The command line is a lot better than Windows at least.