Ukraine's security service accuses senior officials of trying to steal about $40m in an order for mortar shells.

Ukraine’s security service says it has uncovered corruption in an arms purchase by the military worth about $40m (£31m).

The SBU said five senior people in the defence ministry and at an arms supplier were being investigated.

It said the defence officials signed a contract for 100,000 mortar shells in August 2022.

Payment was made in advance, with some funds transferred abroad, but no arms were ever provided.

Corruption has been a major stumbling block in Ukraine’s bid to join the European Union.

The SBU said an investigation had “exposed” officials of the ministry of defence and managers of arms supplier Lviv Arsenal, “who stole nearly 1.5 billion hryvnias in the purchase of shells”.

  • Saganaki@lemmy.oneEnglish
    435·
    10 months ago

    All of those opposition parties banned have explicitly been in favor of Russia annexing Ukraine. Literally every one.

    Not only that, you make it sound like he did this by himself. There has been a ton of parliamentary agreement and has also been upheld in numerous appeals (incl by judges not having any associations with Zelensky).

    I’m by no means a “Zelensky-stan” and have my own criticisms, but either you are seriously being misled or are being malicious/spreading misinformation.

    Not only that, Ukraine runs a parliamentary government. There is no “opposition party”. Americans for some reason always view foreign government political parties through the lens of American politics. This is not like the government banning Republicans. This is like banning the “Socialists for the release of Alaska to Russia” party.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.caEnglish
      312·
      10 months ago

      you make it sound like he did this by himself.

      He is the public face of the government. Of course he didn’t do everything by himself, good or bad. Everybody knows that already, it’s a stupid point to make. He’s chosen to take on the job of being his governments public face, and statements about government being directed at him personally is just part of the job.

      Trump wasn’t personally throwing children in jail, but when people talk about the border detentions that happened during his presidency, we still say Trump did it.

      Obama didn’t personally approve every drone strike, he was backed up by plenty of other politicians, but we still say Obama increased the drone strikes.

      • Saganaki@lemmy.oneEnglish
        82·
        10 months ago

        Yes, but the insinuation is that he’s using war powers to permanently institute himself in charge using only his powers, which isn’t the case. Effectively I’m countering the “he’s a dictator” undertone.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.caEnglish
          33·
          10 months ago

          I didn’t get that insinuation at all.

          Do you see the same insinuations with the statement “Obama increased drone strikes”?

          I’m sure you’d happily support the insinuation that trump was a dictator if something similar were said about him.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldEnglish
      718·
      10 months ago

      All of those opposition parties banned have explicitly been in favor of Russia annexing Ukraine. Literally every one.

      That’s not true. One pro-russian co-founder of the biggest opposition party was expelled and they publicly condemned Putin’s invasion. Zelinski still banned the party.

      There has been a ton of parliamentary agreement

      Amongst his and other corrupt right wing parties glad to be unopposed

      upheld in numerous appeals (incl by judges not having any associations with Zelensky).

      This the same Ukrainian court system that was notorious for immense corruption up to and including the day before the invasion?

      I’m by no means a “Zelensky-stan”

      Then why are you repeating the untrue talking points of him and his government?

      You are seriously being misled or are being malicious/spreading misinformation.

      Nope, you’ve got that backwards.

      Ukraine runs a parliamentary government. There is no “opposition party”.

      There absolutely is. Just because there is a parliament doesn’t mean that it’s all one party or that there are no parties.

      Americans for some reason always view foreign government political parties through the lens of American politics.

      I’m a Dane. Here in Denmark we have a parliamentary government too. We ABSOLUTELY have opposition parties.

      This is not like the government banning Republicans.

      No, this is more like the UK Tories Banning Labour, the Lib Dems and all other parties to the left of them.

      This is like banning the “Socialists for the release of Alaska to Russia” party.

      Again with regurgitating the untrue government propaganda 🙄

      • Saganaki@lemmy.oneEnglish
        92·
        10 months ago

        That’s not true. One pro-russian co-founder of the biggest opposition party was expelled and they publicly condemned Putin’s invasion. Zelinski still banned the party.

        Okay. I’ll bite. Which party?

      • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.mlEnglish
        57·
        10 months ago

        Hilarious to think that Parliamentary democracies don’t have oppositions, the only difference is that it’s usually a coalition or several rather than a single party. You don’t deserve those downvotes, but Ukraine is apparantly beyond criticism.