GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright::undefined

  • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Copyright can only be granted to works created by a human, but I don’t know of any such restriction for fair use. Care to share a source explaining why you think only humans are able to use fair use as a defense for copyright infringement?

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because a human has to use talent+effort to make something that’s fair use. They adapt a product into something that while similar is noticeably different. AI will

      1. make things that are not just similar but not noticeably different.

      2. There’s not an effort in creation. There’s human thought behind a prompt but not on the AI following it.

      3. If allowed to AI companies will basically copyright everything…

      • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You are aware of the insane amounts of research, human effort and the type of human talent that is required to make a simple piece of software, let alone a complex artificial neural network model whose function is to try and solve whatever stuff…right?