• xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Every time I see “backlash” in a news headline it’s always just Twitter culture warriors who are always angry about something

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Literally from the article:

      One person wrote on X (formerly Twitter)

      And that’s it for citations on this “backlash”. “This story is fucking trash” and since one person on kbin said that, it must be true!

      Sometimes I read this garbage and I feel like it’s that part from Mean Girls.

      Stop trying to make outrage happen!

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m pretty confident it’s always the writer who smells an opportunity for clicks, do they write the story first then look for a source.

        If they luck out, they’ll find it trending. But mostly it’s the “one person on Twitter” scenario.

        The worst part is when the content gets shared.

        • niktemadur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          500 clicks in an hour, half a goddamned penny of ad revenue, then it’s time to move on to the next droplet of junk content.

  • Stamets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean they also had Trump on during 2016. Why is anyone even remotely surprised by this? They are a show. They work for ratings. Having someone running for President on there kinda makes sense number wise.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      Less surprise and more disappointed. They are doing the same thing the news stations did during Trump’s first presidential run: giving them free advertising.

      If they don’t court their fan’s favor, they will decline (again) in popularity. One-off stunts for ratings that are unpopular have the potential to hurt them in the long run.

    • realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep.

      As a conservative I feel like right wing social media spins have been more cringe and ridiculous than usual. First the Taylor Swift stuff, now this…ugh.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The problem with the media spins is they have to outdo Trump’s shenanigans.

        As the right pushes further right, the crazy gets crazier.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Saturday Night Live instantly started receiving backlash after Nikki Haley made a surprise appearance during the Feb. 3 show.

    During a town hall sketch for the cold open, the Republican presidential candidate made a cameo to ask James Austin Johnson’s Donald Trump some questions of her own.

    Ayo Edebiri later popped up at the end of the sketch and directed a question at Haley: “I was just curious, what would you say was the main cause of the Civil War?

    Following Haley’s appearance on SNL, some people took to social media to criticize the NBC sketch comedy show for giving her screen time but not other candidates.

    One person wrote on X (formerly Twitter), “Nikki Haley will only ever diss trump on a comedy show, and WTF is slavery denier doing on SNL anyway?

    Saturday Night Live sure does have a long track record of comedy-washing hateful conservatives.” Trump previously hosted the show in 2015 while running for president for the 2016 election.


    The original article contains 493 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    IDK… if this cameo causes one nutty trump voter to flip for her and dilute his numbers it seems harmless. I wasn’t watching ;-)

    • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      *SNL gets mentioned*

      Randos for the last 45+ years:That’s still a thing? SNL hasn’t been funny since I was watching it in high school/college!

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s the same edgy dumb kids who post ‘does anyone even care?!?’ for internet points, except that everyone finds them an annoying waste of bandwidth and contribute next to nothing to the discussion.

        Edit: actually, they contribute nothing to the discussion. Nothing at all.

      • pewter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s a weird thing to say because you can’t know that it’s not funny or still not funny without watching it. SNL is and has always been hit or miss with humor. Some humor ages well. Some doesn’t. Sometimes it’s really funny. Sometimes it’s ok.

        I watched the first episode when they had some anniversary airing and a lot of those jokes are… ok.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I used to watch it all the time, until NBC pulled it off of Hulu. “Guess I don’t need to watch that anymore.”

    • realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I saw some clips from this episode and it was actually way funnier than it usually is. You should check out some skits from the episode!