• Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty sure that would result in negative karma, and thus the new reincarnated form would be even less desirable.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        The word “desirable” in the context of human-only reincarnation opens a whole other can of worms

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There was no indication that karma or any such system was included, you included that into the scenario and it is therefore invalid.

        There would be people racing to get to the simplest organism incapable of sentience if there were a karmic system.

        • Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s what the basis of reincarnation is about though… karma. You do good deeds, your karma level goes up, you get a better reincarnated life in the future. Likewise, the opposite is true as well.

          • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Karma is an aspect of the Hindu and Buddhist reincarnation beliefs. They do not have sole ownership of the concept of reincarnation.

            If they had said “What if Hinduism is right and reincarnation is real?” then that would be a different scenario. They only put forth that the concept of reincarnation was real.

            • Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ah I see what you mean now. Eh, regardless I’m sure the universe would have some sort of similar karmic system in place to prevent thatt suicidal loop hole.

              • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                There’s no secular reason to think that the universe would care, or that a universe capable of caring would see it as a problem.

      • root_beer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Like what, a paramecium or baker’s yeast or something? At least I can’t have a collection agency coming after me then