I just stepped down as moderator from all five of the subreddits I used to moderate over on Reddit. I just can’t ethically justify continued activity on Reddit, and especially free volunteer labour for an openly greedy company that is engaged in scummy behaviour, forcing mods to open protesting communities or be demoted.

So my online activism for boys and men is now focused here and on Mastodon. And I am welcoming everyone coming over from Reddit, especially from LeftWingMaleAdvocates, the sub I put in the majority of my time and effort as a mod.

Let’s build something good here, as we did previously on Reddit. It appears we have a wider reach here, so let’s debate in good faith and with civil manners.

Here, in this magazine (i.e. community or subreddit in Kbin-speak) we wish to discuss and spread awareness of various issues that disproportionately affect males.

We believe men are not being well-served by either side of the mainstream political spectrum. We oppose the right wing’s exploitation of men’s issues as a wedge to recruit men to inegalitarian traditional values. But we also oppose feminist attempts to deny male issues, or shoehorn them into a biased ideology that blames “male privilege” and guilt-trips men.

We have no objection to the genuinely egalitarian aspects of feminism, but we will criticize feminist ideology wherever it is inegalitarian and/or untruthful, especially now that it holds institutional power. Too often feminism has promoted a one-sided “equality”, dismantling male advantages while exploiting, reinforcing, preserving, and downplaying female advantages - particularly in cases involving alleged abuse.

In practice this means that most of us are politically homeless. The natural home for male advocacy should be the left wing, which professes to be explicitly egalitarian. But in modern practice, men’s issues are habitually ignored, denied, or even opposed.

We seek to address male issues without falling into the traps of an impossible return to the past or a disastrous sexism. Men and women have equal value, and we need to work together for a better future.

  • grahamsz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    women by and large choose not to do Work like taking risks, or being in the public eye and taking responsibility for failures that may not be your fault.

    do you have a source for that?

    • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many, but female aversion to physical and social risk is a broadly studied field that you are perfectly capable of searching yourself, and especially with the prevalence of cherry-picked studies i feel it’s better you find one from a source you trust on your own.

      • grahamsz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I looked and literally everything that comes up suggests the opposite.

        https://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/news/2016/why-so-few-women-hold-positions-of-power.html
        https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/01/14/chapter-3-obstacles-to-female-leadership/

        Suggesting that the perfect attributes required to lead a major company just happen to coincidentally be those that are bestowed on white men is absurd. I don’t see much point in continuing this discussion.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          wow, guess i should have specified search terms

          Did they include any of the following that you clearly did not use: female physical social risk aversion?

          Here’s an excerpt from a first page result from just those:

          We find the extremely robust result that women are more risk averse than men

          Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking

          Edit:

          Suggesting that the perfect attributes required to lead a major company just happen to coincidentally be those that are bestowed on white men is absurd.

          Or that women specifically preference men who exhibit these traits, rewarding them with sex and status in ways that women generally are not and have not been rewarded for since our species first started to walk might relate to the skills necessary for success in a competitive field.

          As it turns out, reality doesn’t care about your delusions, or how unfair you feel it is

          I don’t see much point in continuing this discussion.

          Of course you don’t, that’s what people who are wrong usually do.