• underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Question:

    The reasoning in the commenter’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it:

    A) Incorrectly assumes that atheism is a hereditary trait that can be subject to natural selection and extinction.

    B) Fails to acknowledge that the existence of atheists with children contradicts the claim that atheists do not reproduce.

    C) Makes a hasty generalization that all atheists share the same sexual orientation and emotional state, without sufficient evidence.

    D) Mistakenly treats antinatalism as a universal characteristic of atheists rather than a personal philosophical choice that varies among individuals.

    E) Overlooks the possibility that atheism can continue to exist independently of the reproductive choices of current atheists, through the persuasion of others or change of belief over time.

    • joneskind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The whole point of the commenter is stupid because if atheists do not reproduce then every atheist is a child of a theist, hence atheism will continue to exist as long as theists exist.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think they are mostly being anti-gay. Just imagine they didn’t say atheists and it makes sense.