Nintendo’s full case filing


https://twitter.com/stephentotilo/status/1762576284817768457/

"NEW: Nintendo is suing the creators of popular Switch emulator Yuzu, saying their tech illegally circumvents Nintendo’s software encryption and facilitates piracy. Seeks damages for alleged violations and a shutdown of the emulator.

Notes 1 million copies of Tears of the Kingdom downloaded prior to game’s release; says Yuzu’s Patreon support doubled during that time. Basically arguing that that is proof that Yuzu’s business model helps piracy flourish."

  • echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, it’s broader than that. Providing a mechanism is enough. Yes, this is functionally making maths illegal, and yes, this is a complaint we’ve had with the dmca for 20 years.

    Providing the keys is against dmca, as is Providing the tooling that specifically breaks the rights management. This is just the shitty way Americans made the copyright system.

        • hperrin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know if the two cases are equivalent, DeCSS included all code necessary to decrypt a copy protected DVD.

          Yuzu does not include the necessary code to decrypt a Switch game. Users have to either “hack” their own Switch, or pirate the codes. What the users are doing is the illegal part here.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’re conflating the idea of code and keys. The keys are explicitly illegal as they directly fall under nintendo copyright.

            The code is also falling under breach of dmca, as its entire use and focus is to break drm. This is the sticking point here.

            Again, to labor the point, it’s nothing about the keys, we don’t need to talk about the keys.

            • hperrin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m using code in the sense of the word pass codes. Like, encryption codes. The codes you input to an encryption algorithm, along with the cyphertext, to get the plaintext.

              But yes, Nintendo and you are saying that distributing Yuzu is illegal because it can only be used to violate the DMCA.

              I disagree.

              It can also be used in compliance with the DMCA, and nothing it includes are the intellectual property of Nintendo. There are exceptions to the rule about circumventing copy protection, and as long as you use Yuzu with an intent (such as security research) that falls in one of these exceptions, you can use Yuzu legally.

              As long as Yuzu is never distributed by its authors with the encryption codes, it shouldn’t be illegal, even according to the DMCA. Otherwise, there would be no way to circumvent copy protection for legal purposes with regard to Switch games.

              • echo64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                You can disagree if you like, nintendos lawyers, prior art, and everyone who understands the dmca isn’t going to agree with your stance at all.

                Your stance is a moral one. The dmca is not moral. It exists to limit your freedoms in favor of companies’ profits. Enjoy your blinkered outlook.

                Also, never use the word code like that, it’s incorrect and everyone will misunderstand you. It’s wrong. Use encryption key.