• huginn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s that normalized by passenger or is that just the train?

      • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Normalized by passenger, certainly. However, it’s easier to hit passenger capacity in a train than in a (private) car.

        • huginn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wait the private car isn’t normalized as 1 person per car or 1.2 average people per car?

          Deeply suspicious framing if that’s the case.

          • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            You misunderstood me. For one, I simply assumed that locomotives have big engines for a reason and thus the number can’t be calculated for the entire train. For two, when I mentioned the capacity of cars, I meant maximum passenger capacity. I said that because at maximum passenger capacity, cars become a reasonable means of transportation whereas normally, they are ridiculously inefficient.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The 50 is normalized to passenger. I think it’s 30 per seat, but I guess they don’t fill all the seats usually.