Collapse@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months ago

Nuclear is Not a Viable Solution

insightsinnovationecon.substack.com

-22

Nuclear is Not a Viable Solution

insightsinnovationecon.substack.com

VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world to

Collapse@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months ago

Considering the Pros and Cons, Nuclear isn't a Viable Solution for Most Countries

Long article explaining why nuclear energy is not feasible and not insurable.

Chat

Boomkop3@reddthat.com
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
10
arrow-down
3·
4 months ago
The same bs talking points again? Why are we repeating this?

Collapse@lemmy.ml

collapse@lemmy.ml

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !collapse@lemmy.ml

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse – please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.

Related lemmys:

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

18 users / day
2 users / week
164 users / month
2.5K users / 6 months
4 local subscribers
3.24K subscribers
598 Posts
1.55K Comments
Modlog