Inspired by gregorum’s post concerning issues with startrek.website, which is ironic as lemmy.world is a bit glitchy right now and isn’t letting me upload and had to use my alt here.

    • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It, like every series before or concurrently, approaches the universe differently. They all have changes in style, effects, base premise, and acting. It’s Trek all the same. Doesn’t mean we have to like it.

      • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I can’t say if I like it or hate it as a whole; haven’t watched the show it yet (so please don’t assume this or my previous statement are meant to disparage; that wasn’t my intention). But I also haven’t seen Strange New Worlds, which still aesthetically looks like Trek to me from images I have seen. The vibe and tone are way different. Discovery looks like it is trying to be dark and gritty, which isn’t very trekky IMO. Which is one of the two main reasons I still haven’t watched it (the other being Paramount+ fuckin’ sucks)

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Trek is gritty as FUCK. TOS was quite gritty with ww3, genetic wars, khan… TNG had roving rape gangs. DS9 had apartheid space nazis. Disco is quite tame compared to the darker tones of DS9 by FAR. I think even behind the comedy, Lower Decks is darker than Disco.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            Here’s the thing: Trek was never gritty before. Trek acknowledged the hardships of how we got to that utopian place, but only as a… distant abstract. It was in the past. As Trek went on and new series premiered, more history was revealed. It was gruesome. WWIII.The Eugenics Wars. Khan— who we then met, twice, and, who, then became a person of galactic importance.

            But it wasn’t until DS9 that we actually got a glimpse of post-contemporary Earth, but pre-WWIII. We saw San Fransisco in 2024. We saw something we had not yet, as a society, yet conceived in the mainstream: Sanctuary Districts.

            Today is March 17, 2024.

            I’m not gonna lie: in 1993, I was 14. Even then, I didn’t see how we could stop all this from happening.

            I’ll be 85 in 2064. I really hope I live to meet the Vulcans.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              The whole sanctuary districts thing was a response to what they believed was a homelessness crisis in the 1990s, but was nothing compared to today. The idea was that some president would eventually just corral the homeless into concentration camps.

          • CptEnder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah DS9, specifically the Dominion Wars, is leaps and bounds the darkest Trek. It took the question of “how far must I go before I myself become the monster?” and applied it to a Star Fleet officer. And how far he was willing to go to protect the Federation was truly terrifying.

    • Julian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      DS9 screenshots in isolation look a lot different from TOS. Things change.

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        Things change

        I know, I’ve watched Picard season 3 – everyone gets old, especially the guy watching! Oh wait … 😕

    • soli@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re kind of right. Discovery S1 was trying to be a dark, prestige drama. It felt a lot more like BSG than Trek. I haven’t watched it since it premiered but I don’t remember hating it, though I didn’t love it either.

      They fired their show runner pretty early, so there is another tone shift from S2 onward. The tone becomes a lot more like the new-Trek movies, and later much more like Strange New Worlds. Take a look at screenshots from Season 4 compared to Season 1 to see just how much it shifted stylistically.

      The real issue isn’t aesthetic or tonal, it’s that the writing is excruciating.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Discovery S3 had a really great “let’s make a brighter future together!” theme… that then they destroyed by making it end that way.

        I really tried to like the series, but no.

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          So far the only part of DIS I enjoy is Commander Pike (and his Enterprise crew)

          Ok, and the parts with the Andorians/Orions