Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists’ permission. And that’s without getting into AI’s negative drag on the environment.

  • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    This just in: thieves realize law means that they aren’t supposed to steal, theft rate collapse to 0%.

    Also those signs at school campuses saying they are a “no gun zone” means school shootings are officially a thing of the past. Phew, why didn’t we think of this earlier?

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      This just in, local dumbass forgets that the point of it being a law is to throw assholes who do it anyways in jail for being the assholes they are!

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Almost a full day to think about it and the best you could come up with is “no u”

          • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Imagine thinking that I sat around all day to think about this conundrum. L m f a o. Some of us have lives beyond the internet, sweetheart <3