• bort@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago
    1. Users are finally figuring out that some Linux distros are easy to use

    so recommending arch linux to newbies was counter productive all along?

    suprised_pikachu.bmp

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I refuse to accept that. The ArchWiki is super well documented, so there should be no issues for newbies!

      • bort@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, the arch wiki is very good and useful. The issue is, that you need the wiki in the first place. In a user-friendly distro everything would either work OOTB, or it could be done intuitively via GUI.

        how far can you get in arch without opening the terminal?

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I was hesitant on recommending this to my cousin who isn’t as tech savvy as I am. I recommended LMDE instead. I hope nothing goes wrong.

      • bort@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        how far can you get with arch without opening the terminal or the wiki?

        • Spectrism@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          In my experience: As far as you can get with any other distro. What do you think Arch requires a terminal for? Genuine question.