The global spread of the Indo-european language family

@mapporn

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m guessing, it doesn’t list the colonizers there, because in terms of numbers, they’re irrelevant…

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, let’s ignore the whole of the Americas and Australia.

      Lots of people in African ex colonies are native speakers of Portuguese and French. I presume this was already the case in 1950.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then I guess, I was guessing wrong? I’m not trying to claim anything and I did specify “there”, because I did notice the Americas and Australia. I assumed, the definition of “native speaker” was maybe a bit special here…

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            My thinking was that South Africa might have had more immigrants from Europe and such than e.g. Congo. At least, I believe, South Africa is particularly known for having many white folks there. But yeah, I’m also just spitballing…