• Djeece@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, when you consider the US government spends more (almost twice as much) on healthcare per capita than most countries with free healthcare, you’re literally paying more taxes for it AND you have to shell out 50k$ when something bad happens.

    Your only argument is “Taxes bad” even when we’re talking about a system that would actually cost less taxes, just because it has a side effect of also helping less fortunate people.

    How much more egocentric can you get lmao

    • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      you’re literally paying more taxes for it AND you have to shell out 50k$ when something bad happens

      And yet my taxes are significantly lower than if I were in any of the countries with socialized systems.

      • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not unless you’re in like Arizona or Florida or other shit low-taxes states full of freedumb.

          • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah what I’m saying is that most states’ taxation rates are pretty close to what you’d get in other developed countries.

            Except pretty much every other developed country has cheap healthcare and education. The US is truly alone in this, and it shows, because the US also has some of the worst inequalities of the modern world.

              • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Because maybe, just maybe, you’re a good person?

                Oh and also because pretty much every economist agrees that lower inequalities are better for the economy. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh and also because pretty much every economist agrees that lower inequalities are better for the economy

                  Sorry, I don’t consider the purpose of life to be optimizing spreadsheets.

                  • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah yes, not a good person even when it would be advantageous to you, sorry I forgot you’re actively trying to be an asshole lmao We had already established that, sorry.