• huginn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I know helldivers 2 had a ton of controversy around the PSN login but otherwise it’s a fantastic game. Been loving it.

        • elgordio@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Likewise. Helldivers 2 has proven there’s some life left in the otherwise moribund live service category, by doing something different and most importantly fun.

          Somehow I think battlefield will fail to learn anything from Helldivers success and end up churning out another over monitzed, rather dull, addition to the category.

          • huginn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Battlefield has probably been in development for 4 years now and their C-Suite doesn’t know shit about dick. That ship turns like the titanic - It’s going down.

          • huginn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes in that there is a new battlepass every month with new guns and armor to unlock.

            No in that you can earn the battlepass with in game currency and never have to give them more than the $40 that the game cost to have a ton of fun.

            Beyond that - They’ve taken live service games to a better place. There’s an ongoing galactic campaign and the individual missions you run contribute to galactic objectives which have real consequences in game. They have a dedicated “Game Master” like a DND Dungeon Master who decides when to release new units, what happens when we succeed and how to punish failure.

            And most importantly: It’s a lot of fun.

      • 50MYT@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Battle bit.

        256 player servers are just insane still. It’s got the gameplay without the fancy graphics.

    • objectionist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      this will be said every single time a new big game is about to come out and mostly everybody still won’t listen. why?

      …no like i’m genuinely asking, why

      • kazren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because most people aren’t in places like this. Most people don’t care about what the companies do, if they even know. I work next to a guy who buys the new call of duty every time, hates it, and buys the next anyway. Because it’s call of duty. He doesn’t care about mergers, or shutdowns, or what an Activision is.

        He plays his games and that’s it. Folks like us, who are concerned with how the sausage gets made, we’re not big enough to make a difference.

      • SoupBrick@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It will be said to influence the decision of people who are new to the gaming scene and haven’t been repeatedly burned. Not everyone is a doom scroller like us.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Person who relies on stock price says positive thing about product!”

    Well golly gee I believe em! It’s gonna be the first Superperfect AAAAA™ game!

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    So, broken and buggy game with battle-pass and a perfectly functioning store from day one? Of course, a promise to fix the game with a roadmap within a week of launch. Yeah, a tremendous live service indeed.

  • Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m sure they liked that kind of language in the earnings call but it sounds pretty gross anywhere else.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m noticing the language used over and over now is “live service” instead of “game”. I’m coming around to the idea that what they’re trying to do is replace the fact that a game used to be a “good” with it being a “service”. That accursed farms video from 5 years ago titled “games as a service is fraud” was spot on. Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUAX0gnZ3Nw

  • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why does it feel like EA tries really hard to kill off franchises with a loyal fanbase by constantly playing limbo under the lowering bar?

  • teejay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Let’s go boys! Time to drop trou, get out your wallet, and pre-order the super platinum edition with a hilarious camo, useless rifle, and the day-1 DLC included.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    There’s no way he’s dogfooding the micro-transactions. It’s impossible for him to do so.

  • DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    In today’s earnings call, EA CEO Andrew Wilson says he has been playing the next Battlefield game with the development team and it will be a “tremendous live service.”

    “a tremendous live service” said Wilson, “…but a fairly terrible gaming experience.” 😁

    Honestly, I think he may be right with his statement in so much as he was using Webster’s second definition for tremendous.