And the label doesn’t say anything about it, doesn’t have the “don’t throw in the trash” logo.

Those LEDs are glued in, there’s no way to remove batteries before discarding the item

  • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1461 month ago

    We’re also making disposable vapes that have rechargeable cells inside, just without any way to charge them,

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 month ago

      On models without a charge port, some of the batteries aren’t even flat when the pods are burnt out 🤷‍♂️

      Worst i’ve read is around 3.8v under load, which is roughly 60% full… that would be a very destructive result compressed in the back of a garbage truck.

      Been harvesting these so far but don’t have enough projects to use them in.

      • u/lukmly013 (lemmy.sdf.org)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        I had a small bag of them for a year. I’ll just dispose of it at this point. They’re discharged so they likely lost quite a bit of capacity.

        My dad used to use those. Better yet, from Wish.

        And anyway, I have a similar bag of old 18650s to take care of. I should check their voltages now that I remembered it. I know their capacities used to be OK, but similar story. Haven’t touched them for a while.

      • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 month ago

        There are so many sensible reasons to regulate these vapes and yet they go for protect the children.

        How does banning disposable vapes which costs almost the same as cartridges for a non disposable vape help at all at protecting kids who would probably already stand out in the adult-oriented stores these are sold.

        There needs to be proper quality control on these things with a set of ground rules for recycling and safe use. What does it matter if the user is 18 or 21?

        • @GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 month ago

          They do it because “protect the children” is an easy sale, everyone falls in line because nobody wants to be against something “for the children”. Also the reason why the horse gets beaten over every internet censorship attempt.

          • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            230 days ago

            “protect the children” is an easy sale until you want to actually do something to fix the leading causes of child deaths, like say road injuries…

        • @scrion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Totally agree, first thing I did when reading that was facepalm - not a good rhetoric at all.

      • @anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 month ago

        Even if they were all properly recycled, which isn’t going to happen, this product still shouldn’t be sold. We don’t need any more consumables with large ecological impact. Recycling isn’t doing nearly enough to balance out the damage.

      • @cRazi_man@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 month ago

        As long as people keep buying this shit and the industry succeeds in calling this a consumer problem, nothing will change. The onus needs to be on the manufacturer and doing wasteful shit like this needs to cost them dearly.

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          71 month ago

          You need political regulations for this type of shit. There’s just way too many people who just don’t care.

    • Herding Llamas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      *it can be safely done yes, but but shouldn’t and it’s not allowed in some areas. Where I live everywhere that sells batteries has to have collection points for their recycling and it is not legal to put them in the trash.

  • Baggins
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -131 month ago

    Until stupid people stop buying this crap, this is always going to happen.

    • AbsurdityAccelerator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 month ago

      Yes, but companies need to be start being responsible too. I want to see a tax added to every single electronic product that covers recycling.

      • @Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 month ago

        They’ll never be responsible on their own. They’d willingly give you cancer if they knew it was profitable.

        • @Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          We’ll see how disposable they are when the price triples because the government needs to tax enough to send people out to pick them up.

      • u/lukmly013 (lemmy.sdf.org)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Absolutely. Perhaps not in this case, but often there aren’t even viable alternatives. You can’t stop buying everything.

        And good luck only buying stuff not made with child labor and slavery.

    • SybilVane
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      It wasn’t advertised. OP says the label didn’t indicate this was there.

    • Asherah
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      Why can we only ever hold the consumers liable? Why do people like you never condemn the creators and those who sell these products?

      • @barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 month ago

        Currently the only way to do that is to not buy dumb shit. What is condemning the manufacturers supposed to do? Make them shift uncomfortably on top of the pile of money?

      • Baggins
        link
        fedilink
        -21 month ago

        Because people buy them, they won’t stop making them whilst they sell. Stop buying them and they’ll stop making them. It’s not like the are necessary.