The link right here goes to 40:02 of Proton’ boss on the TLE channel about Linux support, where a Drive Client is deemed so difficult to achieve that they don’t even have a roadmap for it. Nor is the word “Linux” featured anywhere on proton’s pages about Drive.
coughdropboxcough
If I believe what I see on Lemmy, 99% of users here are on Linux, and the 1% remaining probably are just waiting on a Drive Linux Client to make the switch, right? Right?
Please take the survey and maybe mention politely our deep sorrow and profound distress.
https://form.typeform.com/to/L0UNpRar
The accompanying message says “Limited submissions. Respond now to ensure your voice is heard.”
Let’s go! Thanks!
I have trouble believing it is that hard, when rclone already works with proton.
Using built-in rclone options, it works just fine. It’s very slow… But it’s the same rate as direct to browser.
So slow and cumbersome. Sorry my benchmark is dropbox
How slow are we talking? Like latency between file add to file start uploading? Or just general time it takes to download/upload?
Up/Down speed is my feeling, but “negotiations” between client and server too.