• mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Dehomed” is almost more appropriate for many without a home. Their homes were taken by resource hoarders using the tools of state.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “Dehomed” is such a better term than “homeless” or “unhoused”. First term I’ve heard that doesn’t put the blame on the person without a home.

      Even “unhoused” is too neutral of a term for how people often end up without secure shelter.

      • Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unhoused genuinely seems like a tip toe attempt to make saying homeless less ugly or like it’s a word to sidestep bs YouTube guidelines like unalive. It’s dumb. Not having a home sucks.

        If I were to pick between the two then “dehomed” explains it better than “unhoused”. But “homeless” definitely defines what it feels like when it happens to you.

      • Willy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        a comedian I just saw suggested the term nomad/nomadic as a much cooler and accurate replacement for all those terms. I like it.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think that one is only appropriate for those who choose to not have a fixed location home. Calling those who are just struggling to survive without a home nomads feels like it dismisses and even romanticizes their struggle.