• cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re right. But I don’t get how people can’t see the risk. No matter how many controls you put in place, how safe you make it, there’s always a chance. And if that happens, we face a nuclear meltdown which will make the place and nearby locations uninhabitable for hundreds of years. I don’t know if controls even exist to prevent a meltdown caused by an earthquake or tornado/hurricane.

    • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is preferrable: a tiny chance to make a small area (Chernobyl-size is impossible with modern reactors) uninhabitable or a guarantee to make the entire planet uninhabitable?