Society’s got priorities wrong.

  • most car travels are 1 person or sometimes 2 person

  • the majority of car travels are quite short, less than 40km.

  • many car travels are just to get some groceries or drop of a little package or just say “hi” to someone, carrying nothing but themselves.

  • cars are fucking expensive, to buy and to maintain

  • accidents become way worse with heavier vehicles

Microcar is a valid answer to all of these, while still being sheltered from weather.

How are urban places (i’m in Belgium) with almost permanent super heavy road traffic congestion, bad climate statistics, high polution values, very limited available space left, no self-sustaining energy production and high traffic accident statistics still pooring in billions and billions in subsidies year after year into “regular” big heavy SUV-like vehicles instead of these? It’s beyond my comprehension. The only real valid reason i somewhat get is the collective scare of being in a crash and not wanting to be in the smaller vehicle. We could save the climate, we choose not to.

  • MICROLINO: 17.990 €
  • OPEL ROCKS: 8.699 €
  • CITROEN AMI: 7.790 €
  • RENAULT TWIZY: 13.000 €
  • FIAT TOPOLINO: 9.890 €

A lot of people here casually spend more on a sunday racing bike every few years for fucks sake.

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Sometimes people do need a car, and if they do I would prefer it to be a small little thing like this rather than something larger.
    These kinds of car are quite popular in Amsterdam, for instance

        • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I want my country to have 1/10 the bicycle infrastructure of the Netherlands. We’re in the dark ages by comparison.

          Still better than France or Germany though, at least we got that going for us