Justice Samuel Alito said in an interview that Congress does not have the authority to regulate the Supreme Court, pushing back against Democratic efforts to mandate stronger ethics rules for the justices. Alito argued that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to regulate the Supreme Court. While Chief Justice John Roberts has also questioned Congress’s ability to act, he was not as definitive as Alito. Some Democrats rejected Alito’s reasoning, arguing that the Supreme Court should be subject to checks and balances. The ethics push comes after recent revelations about undisclosed trips and other ethics issues involving several Supreme Court justices.

  • Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Except that it’s never worked that way throughout the history of United States.

    The Supreme Court itself is established by an act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Congress has always had the power to not only set the number of justices (last paragraph on that link), but to impeach them as well.

    A misplaced comma doesn’t trump 240 years of legal precedent, no matter how much Alioto might wish it did.

    • experbia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      A misplaced comma doesn’t trump 240 years of legal precedent, no matter how much Alioto might wish it did.

      Fortunately true.

      Unfortunately, in the larger court of public opinion, it can very effectively be used as basis to rile up and outrage the domestic terrorists loyal to the corrupted judiciary, so there will most likely be some trepidation about clarifying this.