• Yendor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That particular argument doesn’t hold water. We don’t generally subscribe to this kind of argument.

    The general principle behind the specific argument you bring up here is this: All expression which is likely to inspire someone toward illegal action should itself be illegal.

    CP is likely to inspire some people toward child abuse. Child abuse is illegal. Thus the distribution of CP should be illegal.

    We don’t do this anywhere else.

    Yes we do. Plenty of stuff is banned by federal law. Snuff films, for the same reason as CP/CSAM. Obscene pornography (stuff showing abuse or degradation, even if it’s just acting) isn’t illegal to posses, but it is illegal to buy, distribute or carry across state lines. Ivory is illegal, unless you have a certificate proving it is from pre-1989. These are all banned to stop demand.

    And that’s not even getting started Americas long history of banning books.

    • Wollff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes we do. Plenty of stuff is banned by federal law.

      Do you get what I mean? If you do, why are you being so overly literal here?

      Snuff films, for the same reason as CP/CSAM

      And action movies are not. Neither are horror or slasher movies. Neither is porn. Even though each of them might (or might not) inspire and incentivize illegal deeds.

      It is not a general principle we subscribe to. It is enforced very selectively, and only in areas that we find most shocking. Which is understandable, but neither reasonable, nor consistent. I don’t know about you, but I think criminal law should be based on principles which are reasonable and consistent.

      One such principle may be: “Media which may inspire illegal action, should be illegal themselves”

      But that’s not consistently enforced, but selectively, limited by criteria which seem dubious at best.

      This is what I mean, when I say “This argument does not hold water”

      These are all banned to stop demand.

      And that’s the interesting question: Why only these things, and nothing else? There is plenty of stuff out there which may inspire people toward illegal action, from real world depictions of violence, to action movies.