First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

  • Zink@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is awesome to see, but I wonder if an array of Small Modular Reactors would be the way to do it in the future. Nuclear is a fantastic and safe source of clean energy, so I hope it can compete better on the economic side.

    • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m just guessing here, but due to the expensive safety, security, disposaal, and political requirements, big reactors are likely going to be the most cost effective for a long time.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      SMR’s are even worse than the big ones. With no breeding and small, lower temperature steam generators they’d be undsr half as efficient as a traditional LWR. The fuel costs (which will only go up as the easy uranium is tapped out) alone would exceed the current all-in cost of renewables (which are still dropping rapidly).

      • Zink@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ah well, it figures they have a tradeoff like that. Maybe they’ll be limited to remote locations then.

        Like so many things, it will come down to cost. It’s fortunate that renewables are getting so much cheaper because we pretty much are betting on them by being so reluctant to expand nuclear. Hopefully batteries and other energy storage technologies keep advancing rapidly.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          All thermal generation will cause direct global warming via waste heat if used to excess.

          Fossil fuels have an order of magnitude or two more thermal forcing via GHG, so it’s largely irrelevant there, but solar can produce a couple orders of magnitude more energy than the world uses now without significant land use. As such fusion (with the exception of p-B or He3 direct conversion with no steam engine which is a bit more scifi) hits thermal limits before solar hits land limits.

          Intuitively you can frame this as “a small fraction of the amount of sunlight that hits the planet is the amount of energy that changes the planet’s temperature” which is basically a tautology.