• Serinus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

    I mean, no. It’s really not.

    I do get what you’re saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

        • yuriy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?

          say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?

          some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?