lukenamop@lemmy.worldM to Strange Planet by Nathan W. Pyle@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agologicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square597fedilinkarrow-up12.97Karrow-down193
arrow-up12.88Karrow-down1imagelogicallemmy.worldlukenamop@lemmy.worldM to Strange Planet by Nathan W. Pyle@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square597fedilink
minus-squareSneezycat@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoAll-in, let’s do base 210. Divisible by 2, 3, 5 and 7, covering all the small primes. And we can do even better: base-420 which is also divisible by 4 and a funnier number.
minus-squareAlien Surfer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agoBecause at some point the difficulty increases with regard to the number of symbols to memorize. A balance exists. I surmise it’s either 12 or 16.
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year ago16 is not hard, we use it for hexadecimal all the time. Could as easily use base 32, if it’s a matter of memorizing symbols. Base 30 would be better overall: divisible by 1, 2, 3, 5, and everyone reading this knows more than 30 basic symbols (0-9,a-z).
All-in, let’s do base 210. Divisible by 2, 3, 5 and 7, covering all the small primes.
And we can do even better: base-420 which is also divisible by 4 and a funnier number.
Because at some point the difficulty increases with regard to the number of symbols to memorize. A balance exists. I surmise it’s either 12 or 16.
16 is not hard, we use it for hexadecimal all the time. Could as easily use base 32, if it’s a matter of memorizing symbols.
Base 30 would be better overall: divisible by 1, 2, 3, 5, and everyone reading this knows more than 30 basic symbols (0-9,a-z).