Buy gold!

In my field it’s often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It’s hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don’t go out of my way to figure out the author’s affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I’d say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.

I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.

Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.

Cool! The weight of responsibility of the spiritual guide for a community.

Yes.

Tatakae!

R.i.p. 😔

*irreversible

I remember playing with the little black and white marbles in the logo, or am I misremembering? I have tons of fond memories of the game.

Reminds me of a scene from Don’t Look Up

I see no indicators that this was AI. Lots of details, no inconsistency.

https://youtu.be/YRCmmJZRyJs?si=SyUW8QyahSJ0NsKj

That looks like text photoshopped on a blank shirt, especially with how flat the text is.

Salt water

Tiktoktiktok

Hey everything, the massage is highly defined by now.

Hmm I guess this could be referred to as outercourse, since there really isn’t anything preventing the guy or the girl from orgasming. It’s just nonpenetrative stimulation, no? 🤔 I.e. fellatio isn’t edging either. Or maybe it’s because the penis is very close to penetrating her? 🤨

There’s a Key and Peele sketch about this

I can say with confidence that at least some call it homocide map, with the evidence you’ve provided. 🧐