Maybe I am underestimating the amount of people buying seasons of TV shows on PlayStation, but this seems like a lot of PR pain for very little potential upside.

Disney is not in a position to be acquiring large properties right now. Maybe Amazon is interested?

What happens when you brake hard?

You could make a federal law. It’s a hell of a lot easier.

No constitution, only what is moral…

Theocracy, then?

I can definitely tell that they are next to each other.

Some people seem to think anything is fine if it’s for social media. An Apple genius was fired recently for making ‘I work at Apple ’ tech tip Tik Toks and she seemed totally baffled as to why that might be a problem.

lol. Nah, someone told me not to make my username Tim.

If you really want to get serious about Chinese interference, this is a discouraging sign. An example of doing the bare minimum for the lowest of stakes.

Maybe start with Tik Tok and go from there?

I get that China interference is a big deal, but actually dealing with it means getting serious and banning Tik Tok to start.

This is the smallest of potatoes. An excuse to make noise without doing anything.

This would be a bigger deal if anyone had actually watched the first 2 seasons.

I’m just saying, this wasn’t The Daily Show, either in quality or in viewership. It would be a much cleaner case to make if the show was at all popular, but there were like 12 people still watching. A 3rd season would have been a real stretch.

Shouldn’t be too tough to explain. “We paid a lot of $ $ to bring John Stewart out of retirement, but nobody watched the first two seasons, so we didn’t make a third.”

New info. Suspect is male, and has been moved to another county where they ‘could face charges’.

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2023/11/09/male-arrested-in-samantha-woll-murder-has-been-moved-to-wayne-county-source-says/

Sometimes people are charged with a crime and then found innocent. Should we keep defendants names secret until they are found guilty and all appeals are exhausted?

I don’t think Batman is very concerned with illegal police work.

Was he ever arrested? I’m talking about the police holding somebody against their will without saying who it is.

Sounds like an oxymoron.

“We’ve arrested somebody, but haven’t charged them with anything, and you’re not allowed to know who it is.”

It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to see how that could be abused.

Why not? Shouldn’t we get to know the names of people arrested by the police? Should they be allowed to withhold that information from the public? Seems kind of police-state-y.