

For scooters or cars?
For scooters or cars?
Do you think Iran having nukes would make a nuclear exchange more or less likely?
There’s a lot more cars around than Escooters though.
20 living captives and 30 dead, they’re using dead bodies as bargaining chips.
Oof.
Yeah, given how left leaning and US centric the place is, I can see how they’d lose their shit.
The fucking acronyms and in-jokes don’t help, either.
Are we any better though?
Honestly, that’s one of the more sensible beliefs they have.
I wonder if I’m living in the end times, and I’m not even religious.
Hungry eyes, I feel the magic between you and I.
It’s an XKCD comic.
The Martian is one example where they’re about equal.
It helps that it was a short book, so very little had to be left out.
I’d argue the purpose of almost any handgun is to be fired at a human, any target practice is just preparation in case that happens.
There have only ever been two nuclear bombs dropped in anger in human history, does that mean the purpose of a nuke is to be carried around on a submarine or sit in a warehouse somewhere?
There’s a lot of people here who have no idea how little the general public cares about technology.
Pete the plasterer isn’t setting up his own domain, you absolute goober. There’s a lot of small businesses that are just companyname@gmail.com
Yeah, but if you run over your ex while they’re out for their morning jog, for example, the police will absolutely be after you.
Most calibers in use today were designed for military use, and their primary purpose was to be fired at a human. It just turns out they work well on animals too.
There’s only a few that were designed for use on animals, most as a pest control round.
The procedure here, it seems, is to store them in an inert environment, namely nitrogen, so a very similar process.
Hmm, you used to be able to buy them directly from Google, but that doesn’t seem to be the case any more.
Some of the nuttier members of the ML communities are definitely saying it.